DREAMM-9: PHASE I STUDY OF BELANTAMAB MAFODOTIN PLUS STANDARD OF CARE IN PATIENTS WITH TRANSPLANT-INELIGIBLE NEWLY DIAGNOSED MULTIPLE MYELOMA

Background: The bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) regimen is a standard of care for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) is a B-cell maturation antigen-binding antibody-drug conjugate that eliminates myeloma cells by a multimodal mechanism: direct cell kill and anti-myeloma tumor immune response. Belamaf has demonstrated deep and durable responses as a monotherapy in the DREAMM-2 study of patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Preclinical evidence of belamaf in combination with bortezomib or lenalidomide suggests enhanced anti-myeloma activity, providing rationale for this treatment combination. Aims: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of this combination in adult pts with transplant-ineligible (TI) NDMM and establish the recommended Phase III dose. Methods: DREAMM-9 (NCT04091126) is an ongoing Phase I, open-label, randomized study of belamaf + VRd. The belamaf dose cohorts currently being evaluated are Cohort 1 (1.9 mg/kg Q3/4W), Cohort 2 (1.4 mg/kg Q6/8W), Cohort 3 (1.9 mg/kg Q6/8W), Cohort 4 (1.0 mg/kg Q3/4W), and Cohort 5 (1.4 mg/kg Q3/4W). Belamaf is given with VRd Q3W until Cycle 8, and with Rd Q4W thereafter. After evaluation of safety data for Cohort 1, Cohorts 2-5 were opened in parallel and enrolled pts were randomized 1:1:1:1. Primary endpoint is safety. Secondary endpoints include efficacy, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK). Results: As of data cutoff (07 Dec 2021), 64 pts were analyzed across all cohorts. Median age (range) was 73.0 (51- 88) years, 55% were male, 80% were white, 8% had extramedullary disease, 59% were International Staging System stage II or III, 20% had amp1q, and 17% had high-risk cytogenetics (≥1 of: t(4;14), t(14;16), del17p). The median duration of follow-up varied: Cohort 1 (17.4 months [mo]), Cohort 2 (5.9 mo), Cohort 3 (6.1 mo), Cohort 4 (4.7 mo), Cohort 5 (5.8 mo). Median number of belamaf cycles were: Cohort 1 (6), Cohort 2 (3), Cohort 3 (3.5), Cohort 4 (4.5), and Cohort 5 (5). Most common adverse events (AEs) across cohorts included thrombocytopenia (49%), constipation (43%), diarrhea (32%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (30%). AEs related to study treatment were experienced by 61 (97%) pts. Belamaf-related grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 24 (38%) pts. Belamaf dose reductions occurred in 11 (18%) pts, with dose delays in 10 (16%) pts. Three pts experienced a fatal severe AE (unrelated to study treatment);2 due to COVID-19 infection, 1 due to pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Early deep responses were observed;67-92% pts achieved ≥very good partial response (VGPR) (Table), with median time to VGPR of 2.1-2.9 months across cohorts. Of pts with ≥VGPR, 17 were minimal residual disease (MRD) negative, 10 in Cohort 1. As of data cutoff, 8-75% of pts achieved best response of complete response (CR) or stringent CR (sCR). Grade 3 corneal exam findings were reported in 25-58% of pts;grade 3 visual acuity changes were reported in 21-75% of pts. No grade 4 corneal exam findings or visual acuity changes were reported in pts receiving belamaf Q6/8W, compared with 0-17% and 0-8%, respectively, in the Q3/4W cohorts. Belamaf PK profile was similar to that in pts with RRMM, accounting for baseline characteristics. Image: Summary/Conclusion: Belamaf + VRd demonstrated high response rates in pts with TI NDMM, with a high rate of MRD negativity indicating deep responses. No new safety signals were observed relative to DREAMM-2. Study is ongoing to evaluate the safety and efficacy of variable dose intensities of belamaf in combination with VRd.

DARATUMUMAB CARFILZOMIB LENALIDOMIDE AND DEXAMETHASONE AS INDUCTION THERAPY IN HIGH-RISK TRANSPLANT ELIGIBLE NEWLY DIAGNOSED MYELOMA PATIENTS: RESULTS OF THE PHASE 2 STUDY IFM 2018-04

Background: High-risk (HR) cytogenetic is associated with poor outcome in transplant eligible (TE) newly diagnosed myeloma multiple myeloma (NDMM). The triplet combination carfilzomib lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRD) plus transplantation demonstrated high efficacy with faorable safety profile in TE-NDMM patients (FORTE). The addition of daratumumab (Dara) to frontline therapy also improed response rate and progression free-surial in TE-NDMM patients (CASSIOPEIA, GRIFFIN). Double transplant also improed outcome of HR TE NDMM patients (EMN02, STAMINA). Aims: The phase 2 trial 2018-04 from the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome (IFM) is ealuating an intensie strategy with Dara-KRD induction and consolidation plus double transplant in HR TE NDMM (NCT03606577). Methods: HR MM was defined by the presence of del17p, t(4;14) and/or t(14;16). Stategy includes Dara-KRD induction (6 cycles), autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), Dara-KRD consolidation (4 cycles), second ASCT, Dara-lenalidomide maintenance. The primary endpoint was the feasibility of this intensie strategy. Here, we report efficacy and safety analysis of Dara-KRD induction. Results: Fifty patients with preiously untreated NDMM were included from july 2019 to march 2021 in 11 IFM centers Median age was 57 (range 38 -65). ISS stage 3 was present in 12 (24%) patients. Based on inclusion criteria, all patients had HR cytogenetic, including 17p deletion (n=20, 40%), t(4;14) (n=26, 52%) or t(14;16) (n=10,20%). Forty-six patients completed Dara-KRD induction. Two patients discontinued treatment due to seere aderse eent (COVID-19 infection, n=1 ;drug-induced hepatitis, n=1) and 2 patients discontinued treatment due to disease progression. Grade 3-4 treatment related aderse eent (>5% of patients) were neutropenia (38%), anemia (14%), thrombocytopenia (8%), infection (6%), renal insufficiency (6%) and deep-ein thrombosis (6%). Two patients (6%) experienced stem-cell collection failure. Oerall response rate was 96%, including 92 % > ery good partial response. Among 37/46 ealuable patients post induction, Minimal Residual Disease negatiity rate (NGS, 10-5) was 62%. Summary/Conclusion: Dara-KRD as induction prior ASCT is safe and allows deep responses in TE NDMM patients with high-risk cytogenetic profile. IFM 2018-04 study is ongoing and longer follow-up is needed to ealuate safety and efficacy of the oerall strategy with Dara-KRD induction and consolidation plus double transplant in this subset of HR patients.

Daratumumab carfilzomib lenalidomide and dexamethasone as induction therapy in high-risk, transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed myeloma: Results of the phase 2 study IFM 2018-04

Background: High-risk (HR) cytogenetic is associated with poor outcome in transplant eligible (TE) newly diagnosed myeloma multiple myeloma (NDMM). The triplet combination carfilzomib lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRD) plus transplantation demonstrated high efficacy with favorable safety profile in TE-NDMM patients (FORTE). The addition of daratumumab (Dara) to frontline therapy also improved response rate and progression free-survival in TE-NDMM patients (CASSIOPEIA, GRIFFIN). Double transplant also improved outcome of HR TE NDMM patients (EMN02, STAMINA). The phase 2 trial 2018-04 from the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome (IFM) is evaluating an intensive strategy with Dara-KRD induction and consolidation plus double transplant in HR TE NDMM (NCT03606577). Methods: HR MM was defined by the presence of del17p, t(4;14) and/or t(14;16). Stategy includes Dara-KRD induction (6 cycles), autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), Dara- KRD consolidation (4 cycles), second ASCT, Dara-lenalidomide maintenance. The primary endpoint was the feasibility of this intensive strategy. Here, we report efficacy and safety analysis of Dara-KRD induction. Results: Fifty patients with previously untreated NDMM were included from july 2019 to march 2021 in 11 IFM centers Median age was 57 (range 38 -65). ISS stage 3 was present in 12 (24%) patients. Based on inclusion criteria, all patients had HR cytogenetic, including 17p deletion (n = 20, 40%), t(4;14) (n = 26, 52%) or t(14;16) (n = 10,20%). Forty-six patients completed Dara-KRD induction. Two patients discontinued treatment due to severe adverse event (COVID-19 infection, n = 1 ;drug-induced hepatitis, n = 1) and 2 patients discontinued treatment due to disease progression. Grade 3-4 treatment related adverse event (> 5% of patients) were neutropenia (38%), anemia (14%), thrombocytopenia (8%), infection (6%), renal insufficiency (6%) and deep-vein thrombosis (6%). Two patients (6%) experienced stem-cell collection failure. Overall response rate was 96%, including 92 % > very good partial response. Among 37 (/46) evaluable patients post induction, Minimal Residual Disease negativity rate (NGS, 10-5) was 62%. Conclusions: Dara-KRD as induction prior ASCT is safe and allows deep responses in TE NDMM patients with high-risk cytogenetic profile. IFM 2018-04 study is ongoing and longer follow-up is needed to evaluate safety and efficacy of the overall strategy with Dara- KRD induction and consolidation plus double transplant in this subset of HR patients.

DREAMM-9: PHASE I STUDY OF BELANTAMAB MAFODOTIN PLUS STANDARD OF CARE IN PATIENTS WITH TRANSPLANT-INELIGIBLE NEWLY DIAGNOSED MULTIPLE MYELOMA

Background: The bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) regimen is a SoC for NDMM. Belamaf, a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeting antibody-drug conjugate, demonstrated durable responses in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Preclinical studies of belamaf in combination with bortezomib/ lenalidomide suggest enhanced antimyeloma activity. We report preliminary findings of belamaf + VRd for patients with TI NDMM. Materials and Methods: DREAMM-9 (NCT04091126) is an ongoing Phase I, open label, randomized, dose and schedule evaluation trial. Adults with TI NDMM and ECOG status 0-2 are eligible. VRd is administered Q3W until Cycle 8, followed by lenalidomide + dexamethasone (Rd) Q4W. Belamaf + VRd is administered until Cycle 8, and with Rd thereafter. The currently evaluated belamaf dose cohorts are: Cohort 1 (1.9 mg/kg Q3/4W), Cohort 2 (1.4 mg/kg Q6/8W), Cohort 3 (1.9 mg/ kg Q6/8W), Cohort 4 (1.0 mg/kg Q3/4W), and Cohort 5 (1.4 mg/kg Q3/4W). Primary endpoint is safety. Secondary endpoints include efficacy, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK). Results: Overall 36 patients were treated across the 5 cohorts. The median (range) age was 74.0 (63-80) years;56% patients were male, 17 (47%) had stage 2 disease, 3 (8%) had extramedullary disease, 6 (17%) patients had high risk cytogenetic abnormalities;the median number of belamaf cycles ranged from 1-9. No new safety signals were observed. Across Cohorts 1-5, all patients experienced AEs related to study treatment;1 patient in Cohort 1 died due to COVID-19 infection. The most common AEs leading to dose modification were thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and corneal events. Patients in Cohort 2 and 3 had the lowest number of Grade ≥3 corneal events (3 and 2 events, respectively). All 12 patients in Cohort 1, all 6 in Cohorts 3 and 5, and 5/6 patients in Cohorts 2 and 4 have responded to the treatment;≥half of patients in each cohort achieved very good partial response or better. As of data cut-off, 3/12 patients in Cohort 1, 2/6 in Cohort 4, and 1/6 patients each in Cohorts 3 and 5 remained in complete response. Belamaf PK profile was similar to that observed in patients with RRMM taking into consideration baseline patients characteristics. Conclusions: Preliminary data suggest addition of belamaf to VRd did not reveal new safety signals and demonstrates high response rates, albeit with short follow-up. The trial is ongoing to confirm safety and evaluate the efficacy of belamaf + VRd. .

P-137: ITHACA, a randomized multicenter phase 3 study of Isatuximab in combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in high-risk smoldering Multiple Myeloma: safety run-in preliminary results

Background: High-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (HR-SMM) is associated with a greater risk of progression to symptomatic disease, suggesting the need for early, efficacious therapeutic interventions to improve outcomes. The ongoing, randomized Phase 3 ITHACA study (NCT04270409) is evaluating efficacy and safety of the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody isatuximab (Isa) in combination with lenalidomide (R) and dexamethasone (d) (Isa-Rd) vs Rd in patients (pts) with HR-SMM. We report here preliminary results from the safety run-in part of this trial. Methods: The primary objective was to confirm the recommended dose of Isa in combination with Rd. Pts were eligible if diagnosed with SMM within 5 years and HR-SMM defined by the Mayo ‘20-2-20’ and/or updated PETHEMA model criteria. Minimal residual disease and imaging by MRI and low-dose whole-body CT/PET-CT will be assessed at fixed time points. Results: As of April 12, 2021, 23 pts (median age, 63 [28–85] years;median time from initial diagnosis, 1.14 [0.1–5.2] years) had received Isa 10 mg/kg once weekly then biweekly (QW-Q2W) in combination with Rd. The median number of cycles was 7 (range, 4–10) and median duration of treatment exposure was 29.7 (range, 16.0–38.0) weeks. Two pts met the Mayo clinical model criteria, 13 pts the PETHEMA model criteria, and 8 pts both models’ criteria for HR-SMM. No pt presented with focal lesions at baseline. Seven (30.4%) pts developed 8 grade ≥3 non-hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs): COVID-19 pneumonia, insomnia (2 each), papular rash, muscle spasm, retinal detachment and hyperglycemia (1 each);no pt experienced a grade 5 TEAE and no pt discontinued treatment due to a TEAE. Serious TEAEs were COVID-19 pneumonia (n=2, grade ≥3) and pneumonia, musculoskeletal chest pain and pyrexia (n=1 each, grade <3). The most common, mostly grade 1–2 TEAEs were insomnia (39%) and constipation, headache, and peripheral edema (22% each). Infusion reactions were reported in 2 pts (8.7%) (grade 2, infusion day 1/cycle 1). By laboratory results, no grade 3–4 anemia or thrombocytopenia was observed;grade 3 neutropenia was reported in 5 pts (21.7%), with no grade 4. Isa exposure and CD38 receptor occupancy were in accordance with other MM studies, reaching target saturation in bone marrow plasma cells. The overall response rate was 86.9%;21.7%, 17.4%, and 4.3% of pts have so far achieved very good partial response (VGPR), complete response (CR) and stringent CR (sCR), respectively. Conclusions: Addition of Isa 10 mg/kg QW-Q2W to Rd was associated with a favorable safety profile in pts with HR-SMM, which compares well with Rd literature data in the same patient population. Isa-Rd has shown encouraging preliminary efficacy (21.7% sCR/CR and 43.4% ≥VGPR rates) in pts with HR-SMM. These results confirm the recommended dose of Isa for the randomized part of the Phase 3 ITHACA study, which will further evaluate efficacy and safety of Isa-Rd in HR-SMM. Funding: Sanofi.

Carfilzomib, Dexamethasone, and Daratumumab Versus Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updated Efficacy and Safety Results of the Phase 3 Candor Study

Introduction: The randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 CANDOR study compared carfilzomib, dexamethasone, and daratumumab (KdD) to carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd) in patients with multiple myeloma who have relapsed after 1-3 prior lines of therapy (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03158688). In the previously reported primary analysis (Dimopoulos et al, Lancet 2020), a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit was demonstrated in patients treated with KdD vs patients treated with Kd (hazard ratio [HR], 0.63 [95% CI, 0.46-0.85];two-sided P=0.0027). However, after a median follow-up of 16.9 months, median PFS was not reached in the KdD arm. Here, we report updated efficacy and safety outcomes from the CANDOR study. Methods: Adult patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) received 28-day cycles of KdD or Kd (randomized 2:1). In the primary analysis, PFS was the primary endpoint and overall survival (OS) a key secondary endpoint. In this prespecified interim OS analysis, statistical testing was based on the actual number of OS events observed by the data cutoff (approximately 36 months after enrollment of the first patient);PFS was summarized descriptively. Disease progression was determined locally by investigators in an unblinded manner and centrally by the sponsor using a validated computer algorithm (Onyx Response Computer Algorithm [ORCA]) in a blinded manner. PFS and OS were compared between the KdD and Kd arms using a stratified log-rank test, and HRs were estimated by a stratified Cox proportional-hazards model. Results: Patients were randomized to KdD (n = 312) and Kd (n = 154). Of all randomized patients, median age was approximately 64 years;42% received previous lenalidomide, and 33% were lenalidomide refractory;90% received previous bortezomib, and 29% were bortezomib refractory. At the data cutoff date of June 15, 2020, 199 (63.8%) patients in the KdD arm and 88 (57.1%) in the Kd arm remained on study. Among patients treated with KdD and Kd, 140 (44.9%) and 85 (55.2%) had PFS events, respectively;median follow-up was 27.8 months (KdD) and 27.0 months (Kd). Median PFS by ORCA was 28.6 months for the KdD arm versus 15.2 months for the Kd arm (HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.45-0.78];Figure). OS data were not mature and will be updated at a future prespecified analysis. Median treatment duration was 79.3 weeks with KdD versus 40.3 weeks with Kd. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 87.0% and 75.8% of patients in the KdD and Kd arms, respectively, and fatal AEs occurred in 8.8% and 4.6%;one fatal AE in the KdD arm (due to arrhythmia) and one fatal AE in the Kd arm (due to COVID-19 pneumonia) had occurred since the primary analysis. Carfilzomib treatment discontinuation rates due to AEs were 26.0% with KdD and 22.2% with Kd. Exposure-adjusted AE rates per 100 patient years were: 171.2 and 151.9 for grade ≥3 AEs and 6.9 and 5.6 for fatal AEs in the KdD and Kd arms, respectively. Updated data by key subgroups will be presented. Conclusion: With approximately 11 months of additional follow-up, a 13.4-month improvement in median PFS was observed in patients treated with KdD (28.6 months) versus patients treated with Kd (15.2 months;HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.45-0.78]). Safety was consistent with previously reported results. KdD continues to show a favorable benefit-risk profile and represents an efficacious treatment option for patients with RRMM. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Dimopoulos: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees;Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Celgene: Consultancy, Ho oraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Speakers Bureau. Quach: GlaxoSmithKline, Karyopharm, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen Cilag: Consultancy;Amgen, Celgene, karyopharm, GSK, Janssen Cilag, Sanofi.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Amgen, sanofi, celgene, Karyopharm, GSK: Research Funding;GlaxoSmithKline, Karyopharm, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen Cilag: Honoraria. Mateos: EDOMundipharma: Consultancy;Adaptive: Consultancy;Pharmamar: Consultancy;GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy;AbbVie: Consultancy;Takeda: Consultancy;Amgen: Consultancy;Celgene: Consultancy;Janssen: Consultancy. Landgren: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria;Merck: Other;Cellectis: Consultancy, Honoraria;Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria;Glenmark: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria;Binding Site: Consultancy, Honoraria;Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria;Karyopharma: Research Funding;Merck: Other;Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Independent Data Monitoring Committees for clinical trials, Research Funding;Takeda: Other: Independent Data Monitoring Committees for clinical trials, Research Funding;Glenmark: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria;Seattle Genetics: Research Funding;Cellectis: Consultancy, Honoraria;Seattle Genetics: Research Funding;Takeda: Other: Independent Data Monitoring Committees for clinical trials, Research Funding;BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria;Adaptive: Consultancy, Honoraria;Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Binding Site: Consultancy, Honoraria;Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Independent Data Monitoring Committees for clinical trials, Research Funding;Karyopharma: Research Funding. Leleu: Incyte: Honoraria;Merck: Honoraria;Novartis: Honoraria;Amgen: Honoraria;GSK: Honoraria;Sanofi: Honoraria;BMS-celgene: Honoraria;Janssen: Honoraria;Oncopeptide: Honoraria;AbbVie: Honoraria;Carsgen: Honoraria;Karyopharm: Honoraria. Siegel: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Celulatiry: Consultancy;Karyopharma: Consultancy, Honoraria;Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Weisel: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria;Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria;Adaptive: Consultancy, Honoraria;Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria;GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria;Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria;Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Gavriatopoulou: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria;Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria;Genesis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria;Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria;Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Oriol: Janssen: Consultancy;Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau;Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Rabin: Janssen, BMS/Celgene, Takeda, Karyopharm, Amgen: Consultancy;Janssen, BMS/Celgene, Takeda: Other: Travel;Jansse, BMS/Celgene, Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Nooka: GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal Fees: Travel/accomodations/expenses, Research Funding;Karyopharm Therapeutics, Adaptive technologies: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy;Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Honoraria;Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria;Adaptive Technologies: Consultancy, Honoraria;Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Ding: Amgen: Current Employment. Zahlten-Kumeli: Amgen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded compan . Usmani: Celgene: Other;GSK: Consultancy, Research Funding;Pharmacyclics: Research Funding;Array Biopharma: Research Funding;Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding;Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding;Incyte: Research Funding;SkylineDX: Consultancy, Research Funding;Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Speaking Fees, Research Funding;Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Abbvie: Consultancy;BMS, Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Speaking Fees, Research Funding;Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Speaking Fees, Research Funding;Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Speaking Fees, Research Funding.